Although the project had many learning opportunities, it was not a successful useful product and was incomplete. Lack of end-product vision, proper research, proper division of labour and resources contributed to our not so "successful" project. However, we received a B+, because we demonstrated great independence and persistence in tackling problems. We understood the elements such as cost, time, demand, and intangibles that are involved in product design and implementation. We understood the gab between an idea and product, the need for design and documentation before implementation, and the grave importance of properly defining the scope and vision of the end product.

We conducted a "Postmortem Review", and we drew various lessons from the project. The requirements and the demand for the product should have been assessed more realistically. For instance, consulting the hospital technicians and medical students should have been done. An up-front and detailed literature review using IEEE databases, "The Applied Art and Technology Index", former undertakings, and "expert" consultation should have been done. A more direct, open and immediate consultation with our faculty advisor would have resolved issues that consumed large chunk of time figuring out ourselves. We were good starters, but we were weak finishers and that must change.